It started off with the topic of increasing crime rates and what each candidate proposes to do about the problem in Winnipeg. When Sam Katz and Judy Wasylycia-Leis were asked to comment on the newly purchased police helicopter, I found myself having a hard time differentiating between who was speaking because they were interrupting eachother. Throw the 'mediator', Richard Cloutier, into the mix, and it was a full on matter of how well you can multi-task interpreting mass amounts of information at the same time.
When I worked in Grade 3, we had such a thing called a sharing stone that would enable only one child at a time to speak. It had a friendly ladybug painted on it. Perhaps this is an idea for electoral debates, as it would deem the event to be more of a professional caliber.
I was lucky enough to have to opportunity to ask the political candidates a question at the end of the debate. I asked if they would be able to say something nice about eachother or give eachother a compliment at which point, there were no words, only Katz getting up out of his seat and hugging Wasylycia-Leis. I suppose there was just too much to say in too little time.
It was a really awkward hug too. You'd think they could put their heart into something so small has a hug :P
ReplyDeletePlease don't give politicians a sharing stone.
ReplyDeleteThey might throw it, ladybug or no ladybug.
Good post! The wine glass is making it hard to read your blog - can you put a background behind your posts?
ReplyDeleteThose might be my last words. Ha!